Skip to main content
Back to Resources

Understanding Your Child's Evaluation Report

A guide to reading scores, interpreting recommendations, and sharing your child's neuropsychological evaluation report with schools.

A neuropsychological report can feel dense at first. Once you know how it's organized, it becomes a powerful tool for advocating for your child at home, in school, and across providers.

How reports are organized

  • Background & history — developmental, medical, and school history in your own words.
  • Behavioral observations — how your child engaged with testing.
  • Test results by domain — attention, memory, language, executive function, academics, and more.
  • Summary & diagnostic impressions — what the pattern of results means.
  • Recommendations — concrete next steps for home, school, and treatment.

Making sense of scores

Most tests use a 100-point scale where 100 is exactly average and most children score between 85 and 115. Percentiles tell you how your child compares to other children the same age. A score at the 50th percentile is right in the middle — not a grade.

Single scores are rarely the whole story. Neuropsychologists look at the pattern across many measures to see where things are working well and where extra support is needed.

The recommendations section

This is the most important part of the report. Good recommendations are specific and actionable — "extended time on tests," "preferential seating," "explicit instruction in reading fluency" — not vague advice. Read this section first when you're short on time.

Sharing the report with school

  • Request a meeting with your child's teacher, counselor, or school psychologist.
  • Provide a copy of the report (or just the recommendations) in writing.
  • Ask whether the findings support eligibility for a 504 Plan or IEP.
  • Bring questions; you don't need to have all the answers.

If something doesn't fit

You know your child best. If a finding doesn't match what you see at home, bring it up at feedback. A good evaluation is a conversation, not a verdict.